Car Accident Lawyers Successfully Representing Clients in Dallas, Houston and Arlington

Car Accident Lawyers Successfully Representing Clients in Dallas, Houston and Arlington

Kode Iklan Atas Artikel

Car Accident Lawyers Successfully Representing Clients in Dallas, Houston and Arlington – Being injured in a car accident is difficult to cope with under any circumstances. It is even more difficult when the accident occurred because of another driver’s negligent, careless actions behind the wheel. Knowing that your pain and suffering was avoidable leaves many people feeling justifiably angry, anxious, and hopeless, particularly when faced with a frustrating battle against the at-fault driver’s insurance company.

Luckily, the law provides remedy for these situations. Even though nothing can undo the accident and its effects, you can assert your legal rights and seek compensation for all of the damages and suffering you and your loved ones have endured.

Encrypting your link and protect the link from viruses, malware, thief, etc! Made your link safe to visit.

Queenan Law’s car accident lawyers help automotive accident victims in Arlington, Fort Worth, Dallas, Houston and the surrounding area of North Texas use the law to seek justice for their injuries in the form of settlement compensation. Supported by over 20 years of experience handling complex multi-vehicle accident claims, we are prepared to directly and aggressively tackle all of the challenges your case presents.

Getting Compensated: Insurance Claims, Injury Lawsuits, and Proving Fault

With regard to auto insurance, Texas is a “fault state” as opposed to a “no-fault state.” Unlike no-fault states, where accident victims whose injuries fall within certain thresholds are compensated through their own insurers regardless of which party caused the crash, fault states like Texas require accident victims to establish that the other motorist was at fault in order to obtain compensation. This is known as a “third party” claim.

If the other driver denies they were at fault – which occurs frequently – their insurance company may in turn deny responsibility for compensating the injury victim. This is where a strategic presentation of physical evidence and accounts given by eyewitnesses to the accident, if any were present, can make or break a claim.

While the vast majority of automotive accident matters are resolved via settlement negotiations, efforts to negotiate do not always yield results which are acceptable to all of the parties involved. In the rare event that negotiating fails to provide resolution, the injury victim may then wish to file a lawsuit, through which he or she may seek compensation for a variety of damages, including:

Current and anticipated hospital bills and medical bills associated with your injuries, including but not limited to:

• Medical devices, such as casts and wheelchairs.
• Physical therapy and injury rehabilitation.
• Prescription drugs and other care plans.
• Surgeries and other medical procedures.
• Income you lost due to being out of work.
• Projected income losses, in the case of a long-term injury or permanent disability.
• The pain and suffering you experienced.

Texas follows a doctrine known as “modified comparative fault,” which means that even if both parties were partially at fault for the accident, a plaintiff can still recover provided he or she was not more than 50% at fault. However, compensation awarded to the plaintiff will be reduced accordingly in such a scenario. For example, if a plaintiff is awarded $100,000 but is found to be 10% at fault, compensation would be reduced to $90,000 to reflect the plaintiff’s degree of responsibility for the crash or collision.

Kode Iklan Bawah Artikel

Bagikan ke Facebook